It was very much justified strategic bombing was the accurate bombing of ports, factories, and buildings that contributed to the german war effort. Allied generals ordered a huge bombing attack only when the planes were in the air did a british intelligence officer, colonel david hunt, recheck the full radio intercept. How does the united states justify the atomic bomb attacks on hiroshima and nagasaki in japan we were more than justified in dropping two atomic bombs on it in .
The bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki was not justified definitely not justifiable because many lives were lost and many, to this day, are affected by the radiation from back then because the united states wanted a quick end to the war does not mean that they can go and bomb highly populated cities to prove their strength. Of course those bombing raids caused no more destruction or casualties than other bombing raids of the time as a matter of fact, the katana (often called a samurai sword) killed more people in ww ii than those two bomb raids. Was the us justified in dropping atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki should the atomic bomb have been dropped on japan bombing hiroshima and nagasaki: is it morally right to use atomic bombs. They were planning a low-level bombing attack on tokyo that would begin that evening, but with a twist: their planes would be stripped of all guns except for the tail turret the decrease in .
Accordingly, the allies were justified in conducting strategic bombing attacks, ultimately including the atomic bomb strikes, against japan in 1944-45 but were the specific ways in which the atomic bombs were employed defensible. The failure of germany’s first big bombing campaign against britain, following the allies’ unexpectedly sudden collapse in france in 1940, was in some ways typical of what came later in . The allies were put into a tight situation and could not just stand by and watch their country take the negative impact by hitler’s actions the one who had made the first move was germany as they attacked britain by sending plans to bomb london in order to seize control over the country.
They were preceded by six months of conventional bombing that had failed to effect a japanese surrender the atomic bomb was dropped on hiroshima first, but still japan did not surrender. The united states was justified in dropping the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki for many reasons first of all, just to start out, the bombings had nothing to do with japan, it was about the cold war and the real reason america used these weapons was to show russia that the us possessed them. I survived the bombing of dresden and continue to believe it was a war crime the screaming of those who were being burned alive was added to the cries of those not yet hit the manner in .
The reason i feel it was justified was because if we had just continued to try and starve them out and bomb them even more japanese would have died, more died of starvation and fire bombing than from the atomic bomb (although not in a single day). Firestorms the bombing of civilians many who did not burn to death were asphyxiated in underground bomb shelters it had been untouched by previous allied . Allied bombing destroyed well over one third of all german books as its universities and libraries and museums were unnecessarily obliterated (not including those in german lands taken away) towns with no military significance and having little or nothing to do with the war effort were simply blown away at this point in devastating attacks on .
Free essay: use of the atomic bomb against japan was justified the use of the atomic bomb against japan was completely justified in both cause and impact an. The imprecision of bombing and the use of devastating city bombing in europe eventually swayed united states pacific theater military leaders to authorize bombing of japanese mainland cities tokyo, nagoya, osaka, and kobe all were decimated by incendiary and other bombs.
The allies were not justified to bomb german cities during wwii, however neither were the germans ever justified to attack allied cities it could be argued that defending oneself in times of attack may be seen as justifiable, but retaliatory attacks may not be justifiable. To what extent were the allies justified in using strategic bombing during world war 2 it was very much justified strategic bombing was the accurate bombing of ports, factories, and buildings . Was allied bombing of germany in ww2 justified the allies were justified in carrying out almost any action that helped to prosecute the war successfully and the . This is one of the most complete reports on the bombing of civilians in world war ii the allies were on track toward dropping a projected total of roughly .